AB 1664 - Just for Fillmore
Thanks to Gracy Donahue, new City Treasurer, for tracking down these links to AB1664, (type 1664 into the bill number field) submitted by Audra Strickland. This bill will give priority funding for State funds to cities that have to increase their sewer rates 100% or more.
You can make comments on this bill and your comments (type in the bill number, then select the "comments button at top of page) will be given to the committee.
Patti Walker and Laurie Hernandez will be attending the public hearings on April 18th in Sacramento. However, I question why since at last Tuesday's council meeting a decision was made to pursue an exceedly expensive bond option at twice the interest cost of the state loans. City staff contend that it will take too long and be difficult to apply for the loans. However, this is the way EVERY other city and county are doing this(successfully and for the benefit and protection of their community), except for the very few who got sold the DBO package. Why is our city so married to DBO when they cannot prove that it has saved us any money?
We need to thank Audra Strickland for submitting this bill. We also need to thank Eduardo Gonzalez who made several trips to Sacramento at his own expense. And lastly, thank yourselves and the City Council and staff members who lobbied Ms. Strickland. The rally letters you all submitted, and Eduardo and his staff faxed to our representatives, were helpful.
Now if the City would cancel the American Water contract so that we can qualify for this funding if the bill is approved that could save us from becoming a “ghost town”.
Also, acknowledging that the State funds are our tax dollars to begin with, make sure that they go back with a more cost effective plant and NO 20 year privatization of operations and maintenance.
One point that we have not made clear is that the costs of the MBR itself are not the problem. The equipment is just a part of the overall contract. The soaring costs are due to the “over-engineering” of the entire project and, the fat legal fees and consulting fees. You can believe that a private sector project would not cost this much. It’s like the government’s $500 toilet seats – overkill.

6 Comments:
GAIL-------------------------------
IS IT TRUE THAT YOU OWN A SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF STOCK IN NORAM ?
GAIL-------------------------------
HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF A ECO-TERRORIST?
IF YOU HAVEN'T , PUT YOUR RESEARCH SKILLS TO WORK. OUR COMMUNITY WOULD LIKE TO KNOW.
LEADERSHIP OR DICTATORSHIP?
On October 29,2006 , Ms.Shirley Spitler wrote a vile , nasty letter against at that time candidate Patti Walker implying that Ms.Walker is some kind of " HolyQueen" and her thoughts and her opinions only matter and no one else's counts or is considered. I have always questioned Ms. Spitler's opinion and accusations. Let's compare the REAL record of this current and past councils. These are the facts Not assumptions or innuendos.
Mayor Steve Conaway
Cecelia Cuevas
Laurie Hernandez
These individuals OPPOSSED a special election to replace Mr.Dressler, therefore, these three individuals took apon themselves and ignored the will of the voters , their boss, the tax payers .
This same council also has and will continue to IGNORE the opinion of the community in regards the the proposed new sewer plant that will manange to cause a colossal increase in rates, damage and eventually destroy the small business's here in our dear town.
In 2005 and 2006 the City Council which comprised of Steve Conaway, Ernie Villegas, Ken Smedley and Cecelia Cuevas unanimously flushed down the Referendum in regards to the North Fillmore Specific Plan . This referendum had solid , broad support throughout Fillmore.
So Shirley , your letter was misleading and shows how divisive and manipulative you are .
The real "DICTATORS" are what I unpleasantly described. Im glad the actions of this council have cleared these accusations up.
I have heard that the trip to Sacramento has been cancelled.
What is the point of lobbying for Fillmore to be moved to the top of the State Revolving Loan Fund (SRLF) list when there is no desire to save the millions in interest?
We happy little cash cows can afford the $142 million in debt service.
Gayle try to get all the facts before you make your comments, it seems that at every turn you have proven to be out of control and out of touch with reality.
As for the bull, oops I mean bill, did you notice that it DID NOT HAVE A FUNDING MECHANISM, thus the bill is not worth the paper it is written on. Time and time again the poticians seem to think that by passing a NONFUNDED bill will make us citizens happy campers. The truth is that it does until we find out that they have not funded it. GET A CLUE
GAIL------------------------------
YOU STILL HAVE NOT ANSWERED MY QUESTION'S REGARDING THE LOBBYING BY CLYDE IN SACRAMENTO? I HAVE PROOF THAT HE HAS BEEN WORKING PART TIME, WITH A WELL KNOWN FIRM. WHY IS IT A SECRET?
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home