Saturday, October 28, 2006

North Fillmore Neighborhood Council Debate - Q & A

North Fillmore Neighborhood Committee Election Debate


1) This is a two- part question, if you were talking with a person that was contemplating moving to Fillmore, what would you say the best thing about Fillmore is and the worst? Please answer the second part of this question as though you were talking with a business that was interested in coming to Fillmore.

The best thing about Fillmore is the small town character. We have great weather. We have a beautiful location in a river valley surrounded by mountains and orchards. We have a relatively low crime rate due to our size.

The worst thing about Fillmore is the fact that we have a highway going right through town and the traffic and poor air quality that is degrading our quality of life. We have extended development beyond our resources and now will be facing unbearable expenses for water quality.

For a business, the best thing about Fillmore is that there are some unmet needs for entrepreneurs to take advantage of. We have a need for a book store, restaurants, clothing stores – many opportunities for a small business.

For a larger business, the worst thing about Fillmore is that our workforce has the lowest level of education in the county.

2) What is the very first “thing” you plan on doing one in office?

I want to improve the communication between the city and the public. We need more town meetings, newsletters and accessibility. I want the public to feel comfortable expressing their concerns. I also want to commission a complete budget review/overview so we can get a better picture of where our money is going and what we can do to save money or direct what we have that will give us the most benefit.

3) Crime, Graffiti, and gangs, how will you eliminate or decrease these concerns?

My solution to this would be data driven. I would like to meet with the police department to determine who is committing the crimes(juveniles, gangs, adults), where the crimes are occurring(specific areas or city wide), what types of crimes are most frequent(graffiti, assault, theft), when are the most crimes occurring(which shift-day/evening/after 12pm/am, weekends or Thursdays). Then we can analyze the data and come up with a plan. For instance; say that it is determined that the highest percentage of crimes are thefts – committed by adult drug users – between the hours of 11pm and 3am on Friday night– on the east side of town. Double up the patrols to that area around those hours on Friday, investigate the source of drugs, if individuals are arrested, help find intervention or drug programs. This would be a targeted solution instead of a broad approach. One bite at a time. Just a few ideas. I’m sure the sheriff’s department has a similar plan. Maybe there are no patterns in Fillmore.

We need to promote the Crimestoppers and Neighborhood Watch programs. We have greatly reduced graffiti in our neighborhood just by maintaining the area and communicating to the community how important it is to work together to observe and report suspicious activities. We have stressed the point that we are all paying for the maintenance and cleanup of graffiti and it needs to be stopped.

4) What is your plan to mix residential and commercial growth in our city that is well thought out and intelligent in design?

My plan is to slow it down a little and to have more public involvement. Residential growth in Fillmore in the past has been at a livable pace up until the past few years. The scale of large developments of 1000, 700, homes does not fit the size of this town. They would be appropriate in Oxnard or Thousand Oaks, a City that has a lot more room and that has adequate open space and parks. We have neither. We are running out of room so we need to make sure that we have adequately reserved sites for schools, parks, open space, community facilities, and community gardens. We need to think about the future beyond 2020 – which is only 13 years away. So we build out and then what?

As far as commercial growth we need to make sure that the blighted and vacant commercial parcels in town are attractively rehabilitated.

5) What is your plan to listen to and properly represent ALL of your constituents?

I am a good listener and I listen more than I talk. I am accessible and willing to meet with all constituents. We have conducted a random survey to get input on what the public’s concerns are. This should be done on a regular basis. We are still in a democracy and the majority of voters should have a say in how their community shall be developed and run. I want to implement more outreach and communication by taking advantage of some of the opportunities that that are available. We need to improve the PEG programming (public access television), send out newsletters on a regular basis, have more open forum discussions, create a wifi enterprise.

6) What are your thoughts on the NFSP and the referendum(s)?

When I read the NFSP EIR I was quite disturbed at the significant impacts that this project would generate. The mitigations that were recommended did not appear adequate for schools, parks, air quality, traffic or noise. These concerns were expressed eloquently by many citizens. I was not happy that our development standards were degraded to tiny lots, narrow streets, three story buildings and mostly multi-family all concentrated in one area that was historically rural - not urban. The Referendum was the only option to block the plan.

The status of the Referendum is a little confused right now. Last night’s resolution passed by the city council really didn’t change the North Fillmore Specific Plan but the council and city staff are saying that it’s stopped now. So, there are arguments on both sides. My hope is that we can meet with the city and get some clarification. In the meantime, the rhetoric that they are putting out is overwrought and incorrect.

7) What specifically is YOUR vision for Fillmore in the year 2020?

My vision for Fillmore is what it says in Vision 2020(the original). If the principles and guidelines in Vision 2020 were adopted and adhered to I would be satisfied. I’ve noticed that there is a departure between Vision 2020 and the General Plan Update starting in about 2000. But I want to see Fillmore maintain the small town agricultural roots that were promised and the public was led to expect.

8) What specifically is your plan to decrease the cost to the ratepayers for the new sewer treatment plant?

I have a couple of ideas
· First – the energy costs reduction - alteranative
· Operate ourselves – OMI biggest percentage
· Chloride reduction – partner w/ Rayne, voluntary compliance more education.
· Explore adding tertiary treatment to existing plant

9) How will you increase tourism and film productions in the city of Fillmore?

The City has made a commitment in the past to support tourism and the railroad. Now, it appears that the railroad is being pushed out by residential and commercial property. They will no longer have a maintenance yard and will have to remove their spurs. I would maintain the railroad/tourism corridor per the existing downtown specific plan/business corridor plan.

The city also needs a decent monument at Central and 126 to draw traffic to the downtown merchants. The vacant and blighted commercial spaces need to be rehabilitated and beautified to be more appealing to tourists and film productions.

10) How prepared are you to deal with controversial issues in Fillmore?

I’m working pretty hard on getting myself informed on all the issues. I have read the North Fillmore Specific Plan and EIR, the Grimes Canyon Expansion Plan EIR’s, I’ve toured the sewer plant and water system

I’ve attended most of the city council meetings. I know how difficult it can be to have a position that may not be popular with developers or city staff. I think the best way to deal with it is to be as informed as possible and to communicate as much as possible.

38 Comments:

At 10/28/06 8:34 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle with regards to question 10, it seems as though you left out your constituents, when you discussed having a difference perspective then developers and city staff. Looking at the question I would wonder what you would do if you actually had a small or moderate size of your constituents turn on you and completely dissagree with your stance on an issue?

 
At 10/29/06 8:39 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle question 9 seems to indicate that the railroad company had nothing to do with the loss of there storage yard, yet the city staff and council stated that they had everything to do with it, they are not in compliance with city ordinances for the site, they may or may not have a lease for the area, they have been lazy at best in getting things organized, and only when it came to the last minute and city council was about to make a decision on the project. Why didn't the planning commission look into this before it got to this point? In fact why didn't the city staff know about the possible lease? In fact why didn't the railroad come forth earlier with the lease?

 
At 10/29/06 8:44 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle Question 2 you stated you wanted to look at the data, and then adjust the police force to meet the needs of the data, to summarize, don't you think that this is already being done? Not to mention it is being done by the experts in crime prevention. SO what additional steps will you take to ensure crime is reduced? What is it that separates you from the other candidates on this topic? Finally, what difference does it make the type of crime, crime is crime, and while it needs to be triaged, it is still a crime that needs to be punished.

 
At 10/29/06 8:45 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry the above post was for question 3 not 2 thank you

 
At 10/29/06 8:54 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle question 6, please forgive me, but there is no opinions on eiher side of what the city council did, other then the fact that they saved the citizens of Fillmore taxes, by not having to have a special election, and yes they would have to have a special election due to the fact that it is far to late in the game to get the referendum on the Nov Ballot at the cost of NOT $12,000.00 but at $30,000 to $60,000.00 The reason there is no debate on their decision other then the right of the citizens to vote is because the city council did what the citizens would have done, they voted to adopt the referendum. I am not sure, you say you listen well. WHat I Wonder is who you are listening to, I would suggest that you stop listening and start researching and asking the right people questions. There seems to be a lot of confusion being generated by Patti and your belief system in Patti. The city staff think about it do you honestly think that they are interested in sturring up this much contraversy, the city council do you honestly think that at what $75 a month salery they want to stur up this much trauma, what is the porpose. Their is no porpose, the developers are not lining their pockets with riches beyond their dreams this would be a Brown act violation. So instead of believing everything that is stated to you from one side, why not listen to both and disseminate the truth using critical thinking and logical analysis.

 
At 10/29/06 8:59 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let me just add one more thought, that I did not add previously, the decision of the city council is black and white they adopted the referendum, the referendum people won this round, what is next is the lawsuits by Suncal to undo the referendum. Thus, this segment of the saga is done, black and white, and what astonished me is the all the "contraversy" over their decision, the people that presented the referendum should be jumping for joy they won the referendum was adopted, instead they are angry and upset because the city council saved the tax payors money and did not let us vote on it. So when you are done having your temper tantrum and feel safe in taking off your tin foil helmets, let me know so we can move on and get back to the real issues.

 
At 10/29/06 9:43 AM , Anonymous STRAWBERRYSHORTCAKEFAN said...

IS DIANE MCCALL NOT CERTAIN OF HER POSITIONS TO GO UP AND SPEAK TO THE VOTERS? SHARON VILLASENORS LETTER WAS RIGHT TO THE POINT. I MUST ALSO AGREE THE KENNEDY'S. CAN WE REALLY TRUST DIANE MCCALL? DID ANYONE NOTICE THE MAILER FROM KEN SMEDLEY AND LAURIE HERNANDEZ? IT'S THE SAME P.O BOX AS FRIENDS OF FILLMORE PAC.

WHAT A DISGUSTING DISGRACE!!!!!

 
At 10/29/06 1:57 PM , Anonymous anon said...

Hey 8:59 I thought you wanted real issues without name calling.Please go on about the Brown Act,thats intresting! Foil Helmets is uncalled for you sould know better.

 
At 10/29/06 2:17 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Correction for a Special Election"

There is money Ear Marked just for a Special Election.
Don't let anyone one fool you otherwise. The City has funds just and only for "Special Elections".
So let us get this one at least correct.
THE CITY HAS MONEY ONLY FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION.
IT DOES NOT COST THE CITIZENS OF FILLMORE ANY MORE ANY LESS.

So Mr Campbell, Ms Uber,Mr Conaway, Mr Smedley and whom ever else is stirring the pot with lies.
Do the Citizens a justice by talking in this forum under your names instead of Anonymous.
And speak the TRUTH.

 
At 10/29/06 9:39 PM , Anonymous Gayle Washburn said...

Anonymous 8:34 PM:

You put a lot of thought and writing into your questions and I'll try to address each of them but might not get to all of them tonight.

question 10: Yes, I disagree with people sometimes and they disagree with me. So, you sit down and hash it out, make your points, listen to their points, discuss the options, build consensus and compromise if necessary.

This is the way the world works isn't it?

 
At 10/29/06 9:50 PM , Blogger Gayle Washburn said...

question 9:

1. What are the ordinances that the railway are not in compliance with?

2. Mr. Ristau said that they do have a lease that was being negotiated at the same time as the Shah property negotiations. Ask him why the staff didn't know about it.

3. Mr. Ristau has also said that Mr. Wilkinson has been in communication with him many times.

4. Did you hear Mr. Shaefle's comments? The Planning Commission ignored Mr. Shaefle and sent it on anyway.

5. I've heard both sides and know that Julie has spoken many times. I think they have acted in good faith.

They bring a lot to the community and some of the council member and staff comments were close to hostile. Why, why, why?

 
At 10/29/06 10:06 PM , Anonymous Gayle Washburn said...

Question 2:

Yes, I'm a data person. I like statistical analysis. It's a sickness, I know.

I'm sure they have some kind of system in place. But, I would like to know for my own information as I'm asked frequently about crime and it's hard to separate myself from other candidates without more knowledge.

Everyone always has the same answer but I'd like to have something more specific to go on.

I have met with Chief Macedo and he didn't have any data available at the time. The FBI statistics however, indicate that we have a low crime rate.

I would like to see a local dispatch in the evenings and on weekends. I've had to call on a Saturday night before and it's difficult to get anyone who knows where the local landmarks are.

Youth intervention should be a high priority. I know there are some programs available and the storefront does a good job but there may be other opportunities available.

As far as the type of crime..."crime is crime...that needs to be punished", yes, it all needs to be punished but the ultimate goal is PREVENTION.

If there is an area that is targeted as high crime activity on Friday nights, more visible patrols on Friday night might PREVENT the crime.

 
At 10/29/06 10:39 PM , Blogger Gayle Washburn said...

question 6:

This is a good point and one that I often consider. My assumption has always been that the council members are acting in what they believe is the best interest. They are giving their time and energy to the community for very little in return. Just going to the meetings and participating is a lot of work.

I know that they are not interested in stirring up "trauma" either. I believe that they have to spend way too much time in those meetings that go on until 1:00 in the morning. With that said I do question their response to the NFSP Referendum at last Tuesday's council meeting. Read my topic for today "Referendum Conundrum" for more explanation but I have to say I am losing trust in what's happening up there with this latest behavior acting like there is no NFSP when there is. It's very strange but perhaps you would have an explanation.

I do understand though that there is a lot of pressure to accept the growth machine mantra..."growth is good", "Redevelopment will pave your streets with gold" mentality.

It's a culture that has taken over our state. As we speak, developer lobbyists are trying to write new laws to take away local power over land use.

I could write a whole book about this but don't have time. And, it's already been done. Try reading "Better Not Bigger" by Eben Fodor.

 
At 10/29/06 10:45 PM , Anonymous Gayle Washburn said...

anonymous: On your last thought...read the "Referendum Conundrum" and the comment above this one.

Read the Resolution. We did NOT win the Referendum! SunCal's tract map still exists!

And, that is a whole other issue in itself. The fact that the SunCal entitlements were given immediately, before the ink on anything had dried. Doesn't that give you at least a pause?

I'm definitely not having a temper tantrum, but I am really questioning what is going on here. And I hope you are too.

This is an issue...is it a manipulation of the public?

 
At 10/30/06 8:22 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle,

I was going to comment on several of your answers to the North Fillmore forum questions but after reading all of your responses, I had second thoughts. I realized you have been influenced by too many of the pro-walker conspiracy theorists.

You may have the potential to be a good council candidate, but you have a long way to go. Here are a couple of ideas you should think about well in advance of your next run at the council:

Check with the Finance Director about “audits” – that’s what the city goes through to assure the public their money is going where it should.

Check with the Police Chief – I think you will find they have more than sufficient “data”. They know all that stuff you talk about, what they are missing is advance notice from the gang bangers. Got any idea on how to get that?

How do you think a book store will go over in a town with the lowest education level in the county? Or were you thinking of comic books?

Finally: the sewer plant. Do you realize there are different watersheds and different standards? Umm… ought to look into that.

Gayle, you’ve been gone a long time and the world of Fillmore and Ventura County has changed. You have a lot of catching up to do.

 
At 10/30/06 8:38 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Strawberry, I am a little confused regarding your post what does the flyer for Ken and Lauri have to do with Diane? She was not even in the flyer? Second, Diane has made her point very clear, her and her husband ca,e to my door last week and we had a very thought provoking and well thought out discussion on the referandum and a lot of other topics. Have you actually talked to her or just listened to the tunnel vision of Claire K? If you haven't I would suggest that you give her a call

 
At 10/30/06 8:42 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

ANON 217 it seems as though you missed the point, Please allow me to clarify, yes the city may have moneys set aside for special elections, but where did that money come from, yes you guessed it the tax payors, and once it is used how is replenished, that is correct the tax payors, thus, the city council saved us money. It mught be like saying one has a savings account, but when you spend the money in it, it needs to be replaced, how is it replaced, by working hard and generating revenue, in this instance it is the tax payors that have to work hard and the city that collects the revenue.

 
At 10/30/06 8:49 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle 950, the ordinances have to do with the fencing not being closed or meshed as to not be a site issue with the mess that they created ion the yard. They put a lot of "things" railroad spurs, etc... in without a permit. And yes Tom did state that they were working on a lease, but for the East side of the lot, and only after the city entered into negotiations with Shah. I watched the planning commission on Channel Ten and respect Mr. Scheaffles position, I do agree that this city's tourism is mainly from the railroad. I can understand the railroads perspective, but at the same time they have obligations that they to meet with regards to the city. If memory serves me correctly, was the vote 3 - 2 for the shah project?

 
At 10/30/06 8:51 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle 1006 great answer, I really believe that you have put a lot of thought into the answer, and if elected, I believe you will do the research and find more solutions to the ones being proposed. Thank you for answering my question.

 
At 10/30/06 9:00 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think that you are taling about prop 90, please let me know if I am correct, and yes in my opinion it is an horrible prop. that gives far to much power to the developers to sue city's if the city does not vote in favor of their project. My only question on this is this, look at Valencia, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and especially, Moorpark without the growth and introduction of a higher "middle to upper middle class" these cities were on their way to a horrible future. The growth saved the city, this is a pronciple from economics 101, with out growth a company, city, state, country will fail. in order to maintain it high level of success these entities must grow. The issue though is how to grow. If one looks at GE for example, When Jack Welch took it over as CEO, it was production based on Nuclear power plants, jet engines, MRI's etc... but did not do any servicing of their products. He changed this montra to include the servicing of their products and turn the company from a 500 million a year company to a 500 BILLION a year company. All from growth into the right venue. Valencia has done the same thing, they are looked at as an example of how a city should grow. Although Fillmore will never grow at their rate or become as big, My point is in well thought out growth that attracts the right people for the right jobs and housing market. Thus, what is the "right business" The "right housing market" etc.. for Fillmore? and how will we develop our infrastructure?

 
At 10/30/06 9:02 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle 1045 in my opinion the courts will decide, unfortunately, it seems as though the lawyers will become more entrenched in this process and will ultimately make a bundle on the backs of the tax payors or in development revenue if Suncal wins. As for the pause, as I am sure you can see I always question and pause, and try to use common sense, and critical thinking to look at any issue. Emotions do not serve well when looking at issues.

 
At 10/30/06 6:46 PM , Anonymous Gayle Washburn said...

Anonymous 9:02 AM:

I'm interested in your opinion and you didn't answer the question or address the points being made.

1. Why would the city put us in a position to be sued by SunCal by entitlement of the tract map when they knew there was a possibility of a referendum?

2. Also, what is your opinion of the council members acting like the NFSP was dead when Roger Myers said the opposite?

 
At 10/30/06 6:59 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The cost of an election is cheap compared to the loss of our civil rights. that is part of what we are paying taxes for- the right to vote.

 
At 10/31/06 12:09 AM , Blogger Gayle Washburn said...

Anonymous 8:22

Thanks for the advice but I detect some hostility and condescension here. Do you have a hidden agenda with me or are you really interested in the issues and how to solve problems? I’m trying to be as honest and creative as possible to come up with some solutions. I may not have all the answers but I think I’ve put a little more effort in than some other candidates.

I need an example of “pro-walker conspiracy theorists”. Not sure what you’re referring to.

Methinks you doth protest too much…”audits”? You really jumped to conclusions here. When I said that I want a review/overview of the budget, I meant more of a detailed analysis. We need a little more information and presentation. How are we doing? What percent has our revenue increased? What percent have our expenses increased? What are our total reserves? What is our ratio of capital projects to expenses? Also some accountability reports...such as, are we realizing the projected revenues form previous projects; Hometown, Traditions, etc.?

These are questions all council members and citizens should be asking. Look at Santa Paula’s budget presentation. This is what I am expecting for presentation to the council and the public.

I can't get a link to work but this is the address:
www.ci.santa-paula.ca.us/budget and go to the proposed budget.

Why yes I do. I already presented my idea. What’s yours? I have checked with the Police Chief.

Ah…the book store. Yeah, our demographics might not support this. It’s just a fantasy for me. But, if you got the point, you would realize that there are needs here that aren’t being met.

Yes, there are different standards for some things but I’m referring to Title 22 which is a state standard for recycled water. I’m not exactly sure what you are referring to since I thought this comment was about the Q & A for North Fillmore and I don’t really remember making any comments about the sewer plant.

I haven’t really been gone a long time since I have maintained my property here and visited frequently. I’ve observed everything from a different perspective, more of an overview. I bring in a bigger perspective and fresh thinking and ideas that might be worth exploring.

 
At 10/31/06 7:18 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's easy to sit back and pick apart all of the candidates and their views. At least they are willing (all of them) to try and do something for our community rather than sit back and complain. The only one I do not support is Laurie Hernandez. We need a sober council person, not someone who is high all of the time.

 
At 10/31/06 7:23 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Laurie Hernandez is backed by the Friends of Fillmore. Who is helping with her campaign.....Mike McMahan! He's coaching her every step of the way. Let's have her take a sobriety test before we all vote! There is an old saying...."Practice what you preach!"

 
At 10/31/06 8:15 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah that is right. I heard their are 2 right now who like to pound them down before the have their meetings at City Hall.
No wonder they are so disrespectful to the people who talk during the Public Forum.

 
At 10/31/06 9:35 AM , Blogger Gayle Washburn said...

anonymous: Stop the personal attacks on Laurie please.

After this election is over I hope we can all get together and share a drink.

 
At 10/31/06 4:14 PM , Anonymous Cecelia U said...

Gayle,

Thank you for trying to stop the personal attacks on candidates and bloggers. We out here in cyberspace appreciate it.

 
At 10/31/06 7:44 PM , Blogger Gayle Washburn said...

Cecilia U: You are welcome Cecilia. Some will always disagree on certain issues but ultimately, we're all in this together and in spite of our differences we are a community. Let's stop the attacks!

 
At 11/2/06 8:24 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 659 yes but you forget that you vote to put into power those that best will make decisions on your behalf, thus if you do not like their decisions you have the right to campaign for change in your representation, to vote for the a change in representation, and to voice your concerns at city hall, but once these officials are elected we cannot afford to go around and second guess them, espeically when we do not neccessarily know all the facts. Thus we need to do the research, present the facts, and than our premise and than our conclusion and hope that those that we elected will actually listen. Some may think that they do not, however, just because they may not have decided in YOUR favor does not mean that they did not decide in another citizens favor that felt the opposite, when I say this I am not referring to developers unless they live in Fillmore. It is definately a hard jon and it seems as though there is no easy solution when it comes to a contraversial issue or decision then one can only do the best they can.

Also, the city council only did what they assumes the citizens were going to do, thus did they really take anything away from the citizens or did they listen to them and then took the appropriate action?

 
At 11/2/06 8:34 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle 646
Why would the city put us in a position to be sued by SunCal by entitlement of the tract map when they knew there was a possibility of a referendum?

THEY DIDN'T THE REFERENDUM DID, THINK ABOUT IT THEY HAVE INVESTED MILLIONS ON A RISKY VENTURE, DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT THEY ARE GOING TO SIT BACK AND NOT DO ANYTHING THAT IS LIKE YOUR REFERENDUM, YOU AND 1600 OTHERS FELT AS THOUGH THEY WERE NOT BEING LISTENED TO, THUS THE REFERENDUM. IT ONLY TAKES SOME COMMEN SENSE TO SEE THE RESULTS AND THEIR ONLY RETORT. ADDITIONALLY, THEY PROBABLY HAVE REALLY GOOD ATTORNEYS THAT ARE GOING TO PICK THE REFERENDUM APART AS ONLY AN ATTORNEY CAN. TAKE FOR EXAMPLE A BEACH BALL, EVER READ ALL THE DISCLAMERS, THAT IS BECAUSE OF LAWSUITS, LOOK AT MCDONALDS, HELLO COFFEE IS HOT IT YOU SPILL IT ON YOURSELF YOU ONLY HAVE YOU TO BLAME. SUNCALS NEXT STEP IS OBVIOUS. TO SUE, OR FILE INJUNCTIONS AGAINST THE REFERENDUM ANBD PICK IT APART IN THE COURTS.

2. Also, what is your opinion of the council members acting like the NFSP was dead when Roger Myers said the opposite?

I BELIEVE WHAT ROGER WAS SAYING WAS IN REGARDS TO THE ABOVE, BUT THAT THE NFSP AS A WHOLE IS IN PLACE AND READY TO GO ONCE THE COURTS ARE DONE WITH IT. HOWEVER WHAT THE CITY COUNCIL DID WAS ADOPT THE REFERENDUM, THUS PUTTING THINGS BACK TO THE UPDATED GENERAL PLAN FOR NORTH FILLMORE. I WILL SAY THOUGH THAT THIS IS MY OPINION, AND I WILL HAVE TO DO SOME RESEARCH AND WILL GET BACK TO YOU WITH ANY INFORMATION I FIND OUT.

 
At 11/2/06 8:39 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gayle, while I respect your comments about stopping the smut regarding Lauri, I wish you would have been as strong with ClaireK. But on the other hand, what I would like to know is if there is any truth in the comments. Does Lauri have drinkning problems, I have heard comments that if she is elected they will have to have a happy hour before the city council meetings, etc.... while I would not ask that you respond to this question I would pose it everyone else. I do not feel that you should put yourself in a position to make assumptions about a candidate unless you know them to factual and verifyable. But if anyone else knows verifyable factual information please let us know, it will definately have an impact on my decision on who to vote for.

 
At 11/3/06 12:21 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't know if Laurie has drinking problems. But I was pondering who Isaac is in her own statement on the Sespe Sun. She never said if he was her husband like other candidates had told about their loved ones. So is he her husband or her live-in. May sound stupid but I thought it made her look bad.

 
At 11/3/06 1:03 PM , Anonymous sparklebunny said...

"If you were talking with a person that was contemplating moving to Fillmore, what would you say the best thing about Fillmore is and the worst?"

Gayle, your answer was very relevant and well-written, though in my opinion the crime rate of the city is not relatively low. When you think of the size of neighboring cities in perspective, our crime rate would actually be comparably high for our town's size. Also, there is a very discernable contrast between new homes and much older homes. In fact, generally there are very run-down neighborhoods directly across from new developments (like the condos on Lemon Way and the neighborhoods around Delores Day Park). In short, the larger homes make the smaller homes look like ghettos, and the smaller homes make the larger homes look bad because of how run-down they are. Instead of having associations work on the nicer neighborhoods, and having developers build even more houses, they should focus on fixing the problems that are already in Fillmore. Clean up the graffiti that is on the North Side. Fix the parking lot near the police storefront. Do things that help the entire community, instead of simply the lower class or higher class. In my opinion, this will make Fillmore more ideal. Other than that, your analysis of Fillmore's characteristics were dead-on.

 
At 11/3/06 1:34 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Regarding Gayle looking into the crime data in Fillmore:
Crime statistics do not come out until the beginning of the year for the previous year. Once the Sheriff's department verifies the outcome of the various police reports within each city. Until they do this the police are very hush hush about their crime rates for the year. I was told by Seargeant Dave Wareham this is because a police crime report may seem like it's for a rape or an attempted murder or something but may actually be for an assault instead. So the department is cautious about following up on every report for accuracy. I would say last year 2005 we had a fairly high assault level in Fillmore and per capita our crime rates were on the high side compared to maybe thousand Oaks or Simi. But on the whole our crime rates in Ventura County, with the policing efforts of the VC Sheriff's Department, we are still better off than the folks were in LA county as a whole (except for maybe Westlake Village where crime rates were super low). I could be wrong but I suspect the reason for the high assault level at the end of 2005 was the outside gang members coming up here from LA and stirring up the otherwise less violent gangstas of Fillmore. The reason I think that is because of the drive by shootings which were occuring. I was also told the police services are manned according to number of service calls.
I'm informed by a very reliable source Walker is far more concerned about the crime issues in Fillmore than Smedley.

 
At 11/4/06 1:48 AM , Anonymous Gayle Washburn said...

sparklebunny 1:03 PM:

You made a couple of good points. About the crime, I did find a site to get crime statistics and comparing with similar size towns of Port Hueneme and Ukiah, we are lower. We are also considerably lower than Oxnard but higher than Moorpark. I'd like to get the chart posted but just haven't had the time to get any graphics up.

Your other point about fixing up existing neighborhoods is a good one. Most of Fillmore is designated as 'blighted' so we can qualify for Redevelopment funds. Some should be spent on the actual blighted areas.

 
At 11/4/06 7:03 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you can Gayle I would love to see my friends parking lot of her apartment, which is used for parking at the police storefront, paved. The neighbors there are too poor to have it done despite previous efforts. My friend cannot even sell her apartment because of it. I think if the Police Storefront is using the parking lot, even though they may not be supposed to in theory, the City should be obligated to at least pay part of the cost of repaving the lot. I'd say the place would be a lot more attractive just with this one concession. And the police storefront would look better too.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home