Monday, March 30, 2009

Back to the Blog...

Hi all! Hope everyone is out there enjoying life. Here are a couple of announcements I wanted to make.

  • There will be a Homebuyer's Seminar by Morgage Loans by Trinka on April 9th - 6:30 p.m. at the Fillmore Senior Center - 533 Santa Clara Street. Call 524-1701 to reserve your seat!

  • Be sure and visit the Fillmore Flower Show at the Senior Center on Saturday and Sunday, April 4th & 5th from 1 - 4 PM. It's going to be beautiful!

  • The City of Fillmore is setting aside two Saturdays in 2009 – on April 4, and Oct. 3 – to allow residents and small business owners to drop off materials that are not accepted in either your trash or recycling bins for safe disposal, free of charge. The Household Hazardous Waste Days will be held from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. both days. Residents and small business owners can bring their HHW to Fillmore’s Public Works Department yard at the corner of A Street and Sespe Place.

There's even more going on that I have time to list. Get out there this fine Spring and do something!

8-5x11-seminar-flyer-2.pdf

Monday, December 08, 2008

New Council coming to Fillmore

Well, tomorrow(Tuesday) night is the inauguration for new Council members. The community has said they want a change. What are some of the changes that you would like to see?

Saturday, November 01, 2008

Stop the madness...

Well, I was enjoying my media/blog fast this week but I guess I’m going to have to respond to some of the comments on the http://www.fillmoregazette.com/ . I have to say that a rational person looking at this City from an objective point of view would have to be shaking their head in disbelief. (and Oceans 11 would not be in that classification – I’m suspecting a local operative)

What is going on here? Some history… Interested citizens read that a huge development is going to be approved for the North Fillmore area. The EIR discloses significant environmental impacts that will affect the community forever and that cannot realistically be mitigated. It also discloses that the General Plan is not consistent with Vision 2020. Many citizens follow the governmental process and write letters and speak at public hearings. While some on the Council articulate their very sound reasons for supporting the project, the citizens also articulate very sound reasons but are ignored and disregarded by some Council members. They are told that Vision 2020 doesn’t matter – it’s not a legal document. (It’s just distributed to everyone’s front doorstep while the legal document -General Plan- costs $100’s of dollars to obtain) Citizens who have never participated in public hearings (me) are surprised to see so many people in the community ignored. There is some shock at some of the behaviors and tactics used at the hearings against the citizens.

I believe that I have made efforts to remain professional and polite in all dealings with staff and Council members. While I know many people who are angered at some of our leader’s actions, I have still tried to maintain an objective point of view. I understand the difficulty that these Council members go through with their decisions. I understand what a thankless and low paying job this is and I applaud anyone who gives their time and energy to serve their community. But, I also understand the anger that many in the community are expressing and I sympathize with those who feel they are being disenfranchised by their local government.

So, how is it possible that such division exists? I think those in power have to assume the bigger part of the responsibility. The citizens in this community have little power and no voice (that is heard). Some of those in power now or in the past have engaged in a negative and divisive warfare and now try to blame it on the victims of their abuse!

On my blog (http://www.fillmoreblog.com/) I have bent over backwards to try to engage in a productive and thoughtful conversation and then been blasted repeatedly by “all caps” and others trying to keep the status quo with innuendo and abuse directed at Patti Walker, myself and others. Then when supporters rise up in outrage to defend us, the offenders have to make up lies and spread rumors to try to discredit citizens with no power. What are they so afraid of?

So, with that said, I want to go on the record and respond to a few remarks.

To Mr. Ray Johnson (or is this...?????) This can’t be the same Ray Johnson who was in my computer class. I don’t think so, since my Mr. Johnson was a delightful and adorable student who didn’t express an interest or technical expertise in these issues. I hope someone is not using Mr. Johnson’s name for political purposes. As far as mismanagement, please get your candidates straight. My issues are capital costs and development that doesn't fit Fillmore in size or density.

As far as the FEMA issue, after attending the two most recent (7/17 & 10/14) FEMA/Watershed Protection meetings I am not convinced that all of the effort and money that we are expending on consultants and trips to DC will change the outcome of this study. When the challenge was made, the draft sedimentation study had not even been released. I suppose a challenge would be in order - but with a cost limit. As it stands right now, we are looking at another open ended contract.

As far as an… “…Industry standard MBR Water Recycling Plant with a 50 year life expectation”. That would be a great if we will have the electrical energy to run it for 50 years and could afford it. The future water issues will only be matched by future energy issues (supply and cost). The future “requirement” that you refer to is only for agencies using State Water Project supply. (Mr. Johnson, have you been reading the State Water Board draft notices again?). Yes, using recycled water is a good idea…for LA County…but not for Fillmore. Using recycled water is going to cost us $26 million just for capital costs! The $3 million grant application showed a 1% cost benefit at a cost of $11 million. At $26 million it will NEVER have a benefit for Fillmore. Especially now that it is determined that San Cayetano and the High School fields can’t be used for recycling. By the way, we are not “conserving” very much water. We are just percolating it at a different location - uphill. As L.A. Sanitation and United Water stated at last week’s Council meeting, river discharge is a BENEFICIAL use of the water.

Parks: I’m happy that we are getting a pool and a few tennis courts. Well done by all who participated in getting that pool through. That goes back to many people and many years of effort. I wouldn’t think any current Council member could take credit for that (except maybe Scott Lee). I hope our $15 per year pool tax will provide enough income to pay the expenses. The 22 acre park is currently only funded for the skatepark and most recently the concession stand. It may be years before the funding exists to complete the park. There’s talk of raising taxes via a Parks and Rec District to pay the maintenance for them because we can’t afford it.

As far as the Business Park, I can’t wait to see these jobs. I’m not convinced that Long’s Drugs and a Public Storage will provide the kind of jobs people are looking for though.

Now, on to Mayor Conaway’s comments. Mayor, I am speaking to you directly. The American Water trip…Yes, American Water booked and arranged for the trip. You were reimbursed by the Mayor’s Water Council that American Water is a full member of. While you did speak on the benefits of DBO contracts, you have yet to show how it has benefitted Fillmore. As I stated at the most recent debate, DBO is supposed to be done by an integrated company that “turnkeys” the entire project. That’s where the alleged savings come in. However, American Water is not that kind of company and you cannot document or prove any savings in this instance. The DBO was misused. You were referred to the report from the Inspector General of Massachusetts in the Lynne, MA case, yet there was no discussion of this issue which would have been appropriate and balanced. That’s all I have ever asked for is some balanced dialogue about all of the issues involved in this project. That is not an unreasonable request and in fact would be a requirement for any agency spending this much public funds. There is no acknowledgement of these issues and the response is to attack myself and others for asking about it. The impacts on this community are so severe and far reaching, yet you never asked for an economic feasibility analysis during this process. However, I will acknowledge that when the contract was signed, you were not the Mayor.

You are correct that there is no levee required for Santa Paula. Well before the FEMA maps our plant was NOT IN THE FLOODPLAIN and didn’t require a levee. However, KDF properties did require one so we pitched in half to help them out.

Now you may perceive my comments as criticism and politicking but no, this is not meant to insult you it is only meant to stop the insults that you are hurling at me.

"Oh ya, your Candidate lambasted Fillmore for going with a DBO Contract. In Santa Paula your Candidate couldn't have been more supportive that they choose to go with a DBOF Contract. I don't think a fish out of water flops that fast.”

Yes, my mom lives in Santa Paula so I was happy for the citizens of Santa Paula. They got more for the money than we did. You cannot deny that fact. No matter how you try to spin and manipulate the numbers. They paid less, even when you take out the levee, percolation and financing. And, their DBO was handled more efficiently. The RFQ was less burdensome and costly, the RFP was less burdensome and costly, the contract special counsel was far less costly, and the project management was far less costly. They followed the intent and process of a true DBO company.

You are also taking credit for reducing sewer rates since the last increase was lower than projected. Have you looked at the proformas? The higher projections were based on the operating expenses for the NEW plant which isn’t even online yet. The savings occurred when those line items were removed because they weren’t even needed. There was no reduction or true savings and I am surprised that you would use it on your campaign flyers.

I could go on but I won’t.

“Roberto”: Umm…”Jamey, Gayle, Clay and Brian group” have used lies and fear in their campaigns for years.” What are you talking about? Clay Westling never participated in any citizen advocacy until less than a year ago. I’ve been involved for about two years. The others, I don’t know about since I wasn’t here before 2006. No credibility for you. “Please stop it.”

LOL: I want to point out that the American Water contract had already been signed before Mayor Conaway went on the trip. I don’t believe that there were any other approvals after that. And, it is also a little premature to call the election at this point. The results might not even be known for days or weeks after the election.

Bottom line, there are emotional insults flying from all directions. I’ve taken a lot of abuse, as have some other candidates. I guess it’s part of the game but I have to say that your support has had more practice with these tactics that don’t belong in Fillmore. And, I will say again as I have many times on my blog, to my supporters who engage in these discussions, stick to the facts of the record and the issues, no insults or personal attacks. Disagreement is normal and expected but adults are to be role models of decorum and diplomacy and that is the way I want to conduct myself – even though I can’t control others.

This is such a long read, I doubt that many will read every word. That's okay though. Now I'll be reviewing the new Draft Housing Element – don’t have time to discuss anymore.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Is this a "special project"?

There is a lively discussion going on at http://www.fillmoregazette.com/

One of our readers left this comment recently...

"Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "The fleecing continues...": from fillmoregazette---"missplechkr, thank you forSubmitted by Roy Payne on Fri, 10/10/2008 - 11:10am.missplechkr, thank you for your response to my letter. However, don't feel the need to try and interpret what I have said, just ask me. My statement regarding Ms. Washburn's potential for getting the City into lawsuits still stands. According to the City Attorney, if Measure I passes it will more than likely end up in a lawsuit. Ms. Washburn has been a vocal advocate and initiator of Measure I. Ms. Washburn advocated for PERC to build the new sewer plant in both Fillmore and Santa Paula, PERC is now in a lawsuit. Her actions, lead to lawsuits---"

what say you?"

and here is my response...

"Lawsuits...as I’ve stated before, the lawsuit scare tactics are so hypocritical. I was given a document showing that the City has been engaged in 46 lawsuits while Mr. Payne was City Manager. Six of them are eminent domain actions.

I’m not an attorney but it is my understanding that the issues would be number of affordable homes not built in North Fillmore. That could be resolved by planning 52 more affordable homes elsewhere in Fillmore. The other issues would be inconsistency with the General Plan and Housing Element. It seems to me that those documents could be updated and amended. The City actually amends the General Plan with almost every development approval.

Then the developers with current entitlements: while I am not a lawyer, it is my understandig that to prove a "takings" that a reduction in density would cause, there has to be proof that another plan that is in compliance with the Initiative would not work.



"Diminished property values are considered incidents of ownership, and as long as there are some profitable uses remaining, the loss of a property's best use is not sufficient grounds to find a taking has occurred. (See Lingle, 544 U.S. at p. 538; Del Oro, 31 Cal.App.4th at p. 1080- 81.)"
The project was never feasible at 700 homes anyway due to the high cost of the infrastructure.

What also concerns me is that there have been many anonymous postings on my blog (http://www.fillmoreblog.com/) over the last couple of years using the exact same language and scare tactics about how Patti Walker’s actions “lead to lawsuits”. This may be a stretch but is Mr. Payne at the heart of the Friends of Fillmore or has he been politicking behind the scenes all these years against Patti? I believe that it is against Government Code for City staff or officials to engage in that behavior. And yes, Roy, you are still on the payroll via your retainer (and I hope you are not using that retainer time to campaign against H&I and myself and campaigning for Conaway and Cuevas). It certainly looks that way.

If you want to fear a lawsuit, fear the Sales Tax Agreement issue. While, at this moment, it may still be legal, the legislature and the affected cities consider it highly unethical. The complaint reads...

..."In August, 2008 the BOE determined that several of these sham offices were improper, reallocating almost $6.5 million in 4th Quarter 2007 sales taxes from Fillmore to the proper cities."

Is "improper" the same as illegal? If so, maybe we can get that money back. But we'll probably have to have a lawsuit to get it back!

As far as PERC in a lawsuit, I can find no such article in the Star. Nor could I find any such filing in Ventura County Court records. So I need to see some proof of that allegation. In any event, Mr. Payne was not concerned about the many more lawsuits that American Water was involved in, which we brought to the City Council’s attention in 2006. If you Google “American Water” and “lawsuits” you get about 58,000 hits.

Gayle

Friday, October 10, 2008

Where did the time go?

I can't believe the election is only 25 days away! It seems like only yesterday I was still deciding whether to run or not.

Did you watch the debate on Tuesday night? If not, Channel 10 is showing reruns throughout the day. Did you like the questions and answers that were presented to the candidates? It was important to hear all of the candidates answers whether I agreed with them or not. Everyone spoke from the heart and in their own way wants the best for Fillmore. I'm always impressed with Jamey Brooks' delivery.

What did you think of the answers? Was there a response that any candidate made that you really liked or disliked?

What other questions would you have wanted to be asked of the candidates?

There's a lot of activity going on on all the blogs around. I think it's time for me to get back to work on my writing and start discussing more local issues.

Let's talk about issues...

Friday, October 03, 2008

The fleecing continues...

I have an idea if you are reading this you already know the implications of the economic crisis we are in and the pluses and minuses of the "$700 Billion Bailout".

From Reuters news..."But in signs of the spreading crisis, California said it was running out of money"

Read more here...

As the details filter out and we realize how little it will do for taxpayers and how much it will do for the big banks (and their foreign investors!) you have to ask yourself what the best strategy is for your own financial future.

What can we do as individuals to protect ourselves? I would avoid buying into a system that is only designed to hurt you in the long run.

Please don't take this as investment advice but this is our strategy. Avoid large corporate banks.

Support your local non-corporate bank. Review their balance sheet and talk to the banker and managers.

This financial meltdown is not over.

Saturday, September 06, 2008

In the dark of night...

Ouch...another $25 billion down the drain. Late last night - maybe to avoid a stock market crash - the government announced they are negotiating a bailout for Freddie and Fannie. After hours trading saw declines of 20% - 25% of their stock prices. Stay tuned for Monday.

Here's a link to the AP story on yahoo.com

"The news also followed a report Friday by the Mortgage Bankers Association that more than 4 million American homeowners with a mortgage, a record 9 percent, were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June."

Here's the Wall Street Journal article.

Do you think these taxpayer funded bailouts will help the economy?